1. During franchisee recruitment, KQ Tea Co., Ltd did not fully disclose to trading counterparts in writing important franchise information, such as products and raw material purchase expenses or estimated costs. It was obviously unfair conduct affecting trading order in the franchise market in violation of Article 25 of the Fair Trade Act. In addition to ordering the company to immediately cease the unlawful act, the FTC imposed on it an administrative fine of NT$100,000. 
2. CFK Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by failing to file with the FTC before changing the bonus system and participant qualifications of its Lei Hu (transliteration) Scheme. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company. 
3. Zhong Lian (transliteration) International Co. Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by failing to file with the FTC before changing its office location. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.
4. When Fu Li Di (transliteration) Construction Co., Ltd. marketed its “Fu Li Di (transliteration)—the Queen’s Secret” housing project, it posted images of“a landscape garden, a pond, community roads and parking space” through an “external appearance schematic,” “facility distribution schematic” and “B Section indoor layouts.” This in fact is located on non-urban land for agricultural purposes and agricultural land included in an urban development plan. The practice was a false and misleading representation with regard to use of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$400,000 on the company.
5. Bao Zuo (transliteration) Construction Co., Ltd. indicated that the first-level rooftop public facility space was to be used for a “Tea House.” in an advertisement for the “Shang He Yuan (transliteration)” housing project. It was a false and misleading representation with regard to content of product that was able to affect transaction decisions and was in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$400,000 on the company.
6. EASECOX International Group, a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its product items without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.
7. Mr. A started his multi-level marketing business without filing with the FTC in advance. The conduct was in violation of Article 6 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act. The FTC imposed on him an administrative fine of NT$100,000.
8. In an advertisement for the “Fashion (translation) Bobo” housing project, Cheng Ming (transliteration) Construction Development Co., Ltd. and Bo Gen (transliteration) Development Co., Ltd. indicated that there would be some public facilities such as a gym, a lounge bar, an aerobics room and pool tables. It was a false and misleading representation with regard to content of product that was able to affect transaction decisions and was in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$1 million and NT$450,000 on the two companies, respectively.

《In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese Version, the latter shall prevail.》