menu
:::
Font size : S M L
::: :::

August, 2018 [Decisions]

  1. Junli Build Development Co., Ltd. claimed that the "Junli 16 States (translation)" housing project would be a basement one in the floor plan and would also include tables, chairs and a bar as indicated in the layout for the basement level of the A7 unit. The practice was a false and misleading representation with regard to content and use of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$300,000 on the company. 
  2. Athena Soft International Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 6 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by not filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC ordered the company to immediately cease the unlawful act. 
  3. Diamond Refined International Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its product items without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.
  4. Tian-Man-Yi (transliteration) Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its office location without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.
  5. Ching Lin Development Construction Co., Ltd. indicated in the overall layout schematic posted in an advertisement that there would be public facilities, including a multifunctional banquet hall and mothers' classroom, a lobby with security guards, a KTV room, and a table game room when marketing the "Outstanding No. 1" housing project. It was a false and misleading representation with regard to content and use of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$800,000 on the company. 
  6. RT-Mart International Ltd. made a special offer to allow members to pay NT$1 to make an additional purchase. The company did not fully disclose the restriction and the product catalog was inconsistent with the product to be purchased. The practice was a false and misleading representation intended to attract consumers affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$150,000 on the company. 
  7. Giordano Taiwan posted an advertisement on its Facebook fan page for its promotional sale and claimed that the prize described on the voucher for a room in the Fleur de Chine Hotel next to the Sun Moon Lake was worth NT$19,000. The wording was a false and misleading representation with regard to prize value affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company. 
  8. Samsung Taiwan posted on its website that the company's RT46K6235BS/TW and three other refrigerator models had Level 1 energy performance. It was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$400,000 on the company.
  9. Sharp Taiwan posted on its website an advertisement for the SJ-XF47BT golden color and three other refrigerator models as well as the DW-D8HT-W and four other dehumidifier models and indicated that the products had received the Level 1 National Energy Efficiency Certification and met the Level 1 Energy Efficiency criteria. The wording was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company. 
  10. Huan Yu New Century Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated 1) Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by failing to file with the FTC before changing its sales system and 2) Article 9 of the same act by not filing with the FTC before stopping its multi-level marketing operations. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$1 million on the company. 

《In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese Version, the latter shall prevail.》

Updated at:2018-10-01 14:45:28
back top
Language中文