menu
:::
Font size : S M L

FAIR TRADE COMMISSION, EXECUTIVE YUAN,R.O.C.(Taiwan)

::: :::

July, 2019 [Decisions]

1.

Kanglin Life Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$200,000 on the company.

2.

Canqi (transliteration) International Co., Ltd. posted the wording of “95L” and “capacity: (about) 100L (±5%)” in an advertisement for the “North European style lift-to-open storage box with increased height and wheels” on pcone.com. The claim was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.

3.

Fubon Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. and Canqi(transliteration) International Co., Ltd. posted the wording of “95L,” “95L large cubical space,” “95L super large capacity” and “95L capacity for storage” in an advertisement for the “Muhui (transliteration)” North European style double-door storage box with large clear panels and increased height (6 pieces). ”The claim was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on each company.

4.

Canqi (transliteration) International Co., Ltd. claimed the product “North European style double-door large-capacity storage box with wheels” had a capacity of “95L” in an advertisement posted on Yahoo! Kimo .The wording was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product and also could affect transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.

5.

Naturally Plus Taiwan, a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing the content of its participation contract without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC ordered the company to stop using the unregistered “Partnership Memo” to be signed with participants and also imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company.

6.

Broadquan Enterprise Co., Ltd. claimed the products “300W LED lights” and “150W LED lights” had been awarded the “Atrium LED Energy Label” on its website. The wording was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.

7.

Eastern Home Shopping & Leisure Co., Ltd. and Zifang (transliteration) Technology Co., Ltd. claimed the product had been awarded the Energy Label when marketing the TR-B175HTW-S Tatung refrigerator on u-mall.com. It was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product affecting transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on each company.

8.

San Jiaozhou (transliteration) Enterprise and Development Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated (a) Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its product items and sales system without filing with the FTC in advance and (b) Article 14 (1) of the same act by signing with participants contracts which did not include statutorily required information. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$150,000 on the company.

9.

Wonderful International Enterprises, a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system and product items without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$500,000 on the company.

10.

Song Xi Ru (transliteration) Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its office location without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.

《In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese Version, the latter shall prevail.》

Updated at:2019-12-10 15:08:01
back top
Language中文