Go to Content Area :::    
Home NewsSeptember, 2019 [Decisions]
:::
News
:::
1.

Zong Cai Biotechnology Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company.

2.

Target Global Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$200,000 on the company.

3.

K-Link International Global Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by adding a new sales system without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company.

4.

GNO Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system and product items without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company.

5.

CFDI Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1), Subparagraph 1 of Article 14, Article 21 (2) and Article 25 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by 1) changing its office location, product items and sales system without filing with the FTC in advance; 2) not including statutorily required information, such as complete sales system details, multi-level marketing regulations and the obligations and undertakings of participants, in contracts signed with participants; 3) failing to process participant withdrawals and returned products according to statutory approaches of calculation and within the statutory period; and 4) not keeping its management documents in the main office. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$1 million on the company.

6.

Global Grand Fungi Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its product items without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.

7.

Taiwan Jialai (transliteration) Enterprise Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated 1) Article 14 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by failing to include statutorily required information, such as complete sales system details and multi-level marketing regulations, in contracts signed with participants, and 2) Article 16 (2) of the same act by recruiting people with limited capacity for civil conduct without obtaining the written consent of their legal representatives and attaching it to the participation contract. In addition to ordering the company to immediately cease the 1) unlawful act and present the new contract containing statutorily required information to the FTC for reference, the FTC also imposed on it an administrative fine of NT$150,000.

8.

Rongteng (transliteration) Network Marketing Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 21 (2) and Article 24 of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by failing to process according to law participant withdrawals and returned products after contract cancellation of termination. Citing Article 20 (2) and Article 21 (2) mutatis mutandis, the FTC ordered the company to immediately cease the unlawful act and also imposed on it an administrative fine of NT$1.2 million.

《In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese Version, the latter shall prevail.》

Updated at:2019-12-10 15:11:04
Back