Go to Content Area :::    
Home NewsJune 2021,[Desicions]
:::
News
:::
  1. Uni Airways Corporation, Mandarin Airlines Co., Ltd. and Far Eastern Air Transport Corporation established a mutual understanding to "maintain plane ticket prices after April 2019" and to "keep group ticket prices in the third quarter of 2019 at least at the same rates as the previous year." The practice restricted each other’s business activities and was able to affect the supply-demand function in the relevant market. It was in violation of Article 15 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed administrative fines of NT$1.6 million, NT$0.95 million and NT$0.85 million on the three companies, respectively.
  2. Shunsheng Enterprise Co., Ltd. held disaster prevention presentations and raffles to attract the public to attend, but concealed its real identity and product prices. After each event, its employees followed people home to push LPG bottle shock-resistant devices on them and install the devices. The practice was deceptive and obviously unfair conduct able to affect trading order. It was in violation of Article 25 of the Fair Trade Act. In addition to ordering the company to immediately cease the unlawful act, the FTC also imposed on it an administrative fine of NT$2 million.
  3. SNLED Purification Technology Co., Ltd. held raffles to sell water purifiers. Overall, the marketing practice was deceptive and obviously unfair conduct. It was in violation of Article 25 of the Fair Trade Act. In addition to ordering the company to immediately cease the unlawful act, the FTC also imposed on it an administrative fine of NT$50,000.
  4. When marketing the K.E. microcomputer dehumidifier KED-211 and K.E. microcomputer dehumidifier KED-213 on trplus.com.tw, Test Rite Retail Co., Ltd. and K.E. & Kingstone Co., Ltd. posted the wording "Entire series with Level 1 energy efficiency." It was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product and could also affect transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on each company.
  5. Naturally Plus Co., Ltd., a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 on the company.
  6. Melilea International Inc. Taiwan Branch (Belize), a multi-level marketing business, violated Article 7 (1) of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act by changing its sales system without filing with the FTC in advance. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.
  7. When marketing the "Yen Sun YS-8212RWSAB vertical touch control cold, warm and hot water dispenser," Eastern Home Shopping & Leisure Co., Ltd. and Shoushia Appliances Co., Ltd. claimed in the advertisement that the product was "rated as having Level 1 energy efficiency, the most power-saving." It was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product and could also affect transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on each company.
  8. When marketing the "Yen Sun YS-8212RWSAB vertical touch control cold, warm and hot water dispenser," Yen Sun Technology Corp. claimed in the advertisement that the product was "rated as having Level 1 energy efficiency, the most power-saving." It was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product and could also affect transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on the company.
  9. When marketing a "3M air purifier" product on the friDay shopping website, Yuanshi Digital Technology Co., Ltd. and Creata Corporation posted the wording "awarded the Energy Label by the Ministry of Economic Affairs." The claim was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product and could also affect transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on each company.
  10. When marketing the "Coway extra protection anti-allergy air purifier AP-1009CH + filters for three years," PayEasy Digital Integration Co., Ltd. and Gewei Home Appliance Co., Ltd. claimed the product had passed the "Energy Label Certification." The claim was a false and misleading representation with regard to quality of product and could also affect transaction decisions in violation of Article 21 (1) of the Fair Trade Act. The FTC imposed an administrative fine of NT$50,000 on each company.

 

《In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese Version, the latter shall prevail.》

Updated at:2021-07-29 15:00:26
Back